A large traditional Japanese house is divided into a compact residence for two people and a small pebble garden retaining traditional roof and posts
๊ฐ์๊ณ ์ ์ ํต ์ฃผํ์ ๋ ์ฌ๋์ด ์ด ๋งํ ์์ ์ด๋ฆผ์ง๊ณผ ์๊ฐ ์ ์์ผ๋ก ๋๋๋ค
DOG
This project focuses on reducing the size of a traditional 50-year-old Japanese house, which is too large for two adults to live in. Originally, the property was a โcorridor and marginalโ type dwelling, with a dark interior, as there was almost no light entering into the property, even on the north side during the day.
์ผ๋ณธ ๊ฐ์๊ณ ์ ์ง์ญ์ ์๋ 50๋ ๋ ์ ์ฃผํ์ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ์ค์ธ ํ๋ก์ ํธ๋ค. ์ฑ์ธ ๋ ๋ช ์ด ์ด๊ธฐ์ ๋๋ฌด ์ปธ๋ ์ด ์ง์ ๊ฐ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ด ๋ณต๋๋ก ์ด์ด์ง๊ณ ๋ง๋น์ด ๋์ ํํ๋ก, ํ๋ฎ์๋ ๋น์ด ๊ฑฐ์ ๋ค์ด์ค์ง ์์ ์ค๋ด๊ฐ ์ด๋์ปด์ปดํ๋ค. ๋๊ตฌ๋ ์ค๋์ ์ ์ง์ ๊ฑด๋ฌผ์ด๋ค ๋ณด๋ ๋ํธ ์ฆ์ถ๋ถ๋ฅผ ์ ์ธํ๊ณ ๋ด์ง ์ค๊ณ๋ฅผ ์ ์ฉํ์ง ์์ ์ํ์๋ค. ์ด์ ์ ์ฒด 4๋ถ์ 1๊ฐ๋ ์ฐจ์งํ ์์ธก ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ๊ณจ์กฐ์ ์ง๋ถ๋ง ๋จ๊ธฐ๊ณ ๋ชจ๋ ํ๋ฌผ๊ธฐ๋ก ํ๋ค.
Project: A new reduction house in Kawagoe / Location: Kawagoe-shi Saitama, Japan / Architect: DOG / Lead architect: Ryutaro Saito + Yuki Kojima / Structural engineer: Tetsuya Tanaka / Tetsuya Tanaka Structural Engineers / Builder: FREEDEA / Area: 950.99m2 / Building area: 123.98m2 / Total floor area: 87.67m2 / Structure, Number of floors: RC+W/1F / Design: 2019.1~2019.7 / Construction: 2019.8~2019.11 / Photograph: Nao Takahashi
Closer inspection during the building survey revealed that the existing main house had no seismic resistance and only the eastern extension was braced, so the overall seismic balance was poor. Therefore, the architects decided to dismantle the west side of the building, about a quarter of the whole property, leaving behind only the framework and roof.
The Japanese roof tiles of this house were in good condition, and the designers felt that the character of these tiles was effective on the gable-ends of the residence. As a result of retaining this original feature, a semi-outdoor space was created, and by applying gravel to the inside of the foundations here, the area becomes a rock garden with an unusual texture.
์ง๋ถ์ ๋จ๊ธด ์ด์ ๋ ๊ธฐ์ ์ํ๊ฐ ์ข์ ๋ฐ๋ค, ๋ฐ๊ณต์ง๋ถ์ ์ด์ธ๋ฆฌ๋ ์ฌ๋ฃ๋ก ์ผ๋ณธ์ ๊ธฐ์๋ง ํ ๊ฒ ์์ด์๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ ๊ฒ ๊ธฐ๋ฅ ์์ ์ง๋ถ๋ง ๋จ์ ๋ฐ๊ฐ๋ฐฉํ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ด ํ์ํ๋ค. ์์ด์ ํ๋ธ ๊ณต๊ฐ์๋ ์์ง์ผ ๋ ์๋ฐ์๋ฐํ ์๋ฆฌ๊ฐ ๋๋ ์๊ฐ ์ ์์ ๋ง๋ค์๋ค.
์๊ฐ ์ ์๊ณผ ์ง ๋ด๋ถ ์ฌ์ด์ ๊ฐํ ์ฝํฌ๋ฆฌํธ ๋ฒฝ์ด ๊ฐ๋ก์ง๋ฅธ๋ค. ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ชฉ์ฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฅ ์ฌ์ด๋ฅผ ์ฑ์ฐ๋ฉด์ ๋ด์ง ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ฐํ๋๋ฐ, ๋ชจ์๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ง๋ ์๋ง๋น๊น์ง ์ด์ด์ง๋ฉด์ ๋ง๋น ์ ์ ์ฌ๋ก ํตํ๋ ๋๋ฌธ์ด ๋๋ค. ๋ฒฝ์ด ์ง๋ถ ๋ณด๊น์ง ๋ฟ์ง ์๊ณ , ์ฐฝ๋ฌธ์ด ๊ทธ ์ฌ์ด๋ฅผ ์ฑ์ ์๊ณผ ๋ฐ์ ์ฐ๊ฒฐํ๋ค. ๋๋จธ์ง ์๋ถ๋ถ์ ํฉํ์ผ๋ก ๋ง๋ฌด๋ฆฌํด ์์ฐ์ค๋ฝ๊ฒ ๊ฑฐ์ค ์ฒ์ฅ์ ๋ง๋ค์๋ค.
Reinforced concrete walls were used at the boundary between the pebble garden and the interior space. This reinforced concrete wall extends from the house and also serves as the gate of the shrine on the site. The concrete wall is installed to a level that does not quite reach the wooden roof beams; it swallows the existing wooden pillars, showcasing them while tightening them to make shorter columns, and performing seismic reinforcement; it creates a texture that evokes a new life.
This concrete wall also includes some windows that connect the interior and exterior, and on the higher side, the ceiling made of indoor plywood appears visually continuous to the existing shed structure. As a result, the living room, that is surrounded by the texture of reinforced concrete and wood, appears to be a continuous space with the outside. The architects succeeded in reducing the livable area of the residence without impairing the size and volume of the original house. Such a manner of โreduction with the feeling of additionโ challenges the concept of โrenovationโ and supplants it with the feeling of a โnew constructionโ.
๊ฑด์ถ๊ฐ๋ ๊ธฐ์กด ์ง์ ๊ท๋ชจ๋ฅผ ์๋์ง ์๊ณ ๋ ๋ ์ฌ๋์ด ์ด ์ง์ผ๋ก ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ์๋ง๊ฒ ์ค์๋ค. ์คํ๋ ค ์ธ๋ถ ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ๋ง๋ถ์ธ ๋๋์ด๋ค. ์ด๋ ๊ฒ โ๋ง๋ถ์ธ ๋ฏ ์ค์ธโ ๋ฐฉ์์ด โ๊ฐ์กฐโ์ ๊ฐ๋ ์ ๋ค์ง์ด โ์ ๊ฑด๋ฌผโ์ ๋ง๋ค์๋ค.















































